If you manufacture products, run a fabrication shop, do engineering-heavy contracting work, or are even exploring how to redevelop processes in your business using AI, the R&D tax credit for manufacturers just got a lot more valuable, and if you’ve been claiming it since 2022, you may be able to go back and get money you already overpaid. New Section 174A permanently restores full, immediate expensing for domestic research costs, undoing a rule that quietly squeezed manufacturers’ cash flow for the last three years.
We’ve written before about what actually qualifies as R&D for small manufacturers, so this post focuses on what changed and why it matters now.
Starting in 2022, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act forced businesses to stop deducting domestic research and experimental costs immediately. Instead, businesses had to capitalize those costs and amortize them over five years. For manufacturers investing in new tooling, process improvements, or product development, that meant a real cash flow hit: you spent the money on R&D this year but only got to deduct a fifth of it.
New Section 174A, created by the One, Big, Beautiful Bill, permanently restores full expensing of domestic research and experimental costs for tax years beginning after December 31, 2024. The IRS laid out the procedural mechanics in Revenue Procedure 2025-28, issued August 28, 2025. In plain terms:
This is the part manufacturers most often miss: if your average annual gross receipts are roughly $31 million or less, you may qualify for the small business retroactivity election, which allows you to go back and amend your 2022, 2023, and 2024 returns to apply full expensing retroactively.
If you were forced to amortize R&D costs in any of those years, and most small and mid-sized manufacturers were, this election could mean real refunds sitting in prior-year returns you’ve already filed. This isn’t automatic. It requires an affirmative election and, in most cases, amended returns, so it’s worth a real look rather than an assumption that it doesn’t apply to you.
The activities that qualify haven’t changed, just how fast you get to deduct them. If your shop is doing any of the following, it’s worth revisiting whether you’re capturing the credit at all:
For the full four-part qualification test and documentation checklist, see our earlier R&D tax credit guide or the IRS Research Credit overview.
Manufacturers who track R&D costs well tend to already have solid production and job costing systems in place, the same systems that support accurate inventory costing and valuation. If your shop-floor cost tracking is loose, it’s harder to substantiate an R&D claim and harder to know what your products actually cost you. Tightening one tends to tighten the other.
Section 174A is a new tax provision, created by the One, Big, Beautiful Bill, that permanently restores full and immediate expensing for domestic research and experimental costs. It applies to tax years beginning after December 31, 2024, and reverses a rule that had forced businesses to amortize those costs over five years starting in 2022.
Yes, for 2025 itself. Taxpayers can elect to deduct any remaining unamortized R&D costs from 2022 through 2024 in a single lump sum in 2025, or spread the remaining balance over 2025 and 2026 instead.
If your average annual gross receipts are roughly $31 million or less, you may qualify to amend your 2022, 2023, and 2024 tax returns and apply full expensing retroactively. This isn’t automatic. It requires an affirmative election and, in most cases, filing amended returns.
No. Section 174A relief applies only to domestic research and experimental costs. Foreign research costs must still be amortized over 15 years.
Qualifying activities include developing new products or improving existing ones, designing custom tooling or machinery for a specific job, working through material or formulation changes, building or modifying production automation, and solving technical problems on custom fabrication or engineering-heavy jobs where the solution wasn’t already known.
Between the new immediate expensing rules and the retroactive refund option, this is one of the more consequential tax changes for manufacturers and engineering-heavy contractors in years, and one of the easiest to miss if no one flags it. Book a 30-minute call with our team, and we’ll look at whether the retroactive election makes sense for your prior returns and how to structure the credit correctly going forward. Prefer to start with a question? Start a conversation here.
This article is for general informational purposes only and is not tax advice. Section 174A elections and R&D credit qualification are complex and fact-specific; please consult a qualified tax professional about your situation.

Christine Gervais
Christine Gervais is a licensed CPA, using her skills to help businesses grow and achieve their fullest potential. Christine has a Master’s degree in accounting from Southern New Hampshire University in addition to holding her CPA license for over a decade. Notably, Christine is a nationally recognized speaker providing education to other CPAs on how to best serve clients as well as instruction on a wide variety of topics for business owners on how to maximize success. Christine prides herself on the value she can bring to clients with her extensive tax knowledge and provides strategic, forward-thinking financial strategies to help clients grow. When not behind her desk, you can find Christine spending quality time with her daughter and stepson or tending to the family’s excessively loved farm animals.